Relationships have their nourishment entrenched in communication. Without communication, even with the self itself, from an individual perspective, there exists no growth. We can see that everyday when we wake up to tackle the world. We are in constant communication with who we are as we battle with the forces of destiny to attain the goals we have set out for our selves. However even if we are fueled by self ambition, because by default we are social beings, we are compelled to establish relationships outside of our own personal spheres in order to achieve our goals; additionally those formed relationship need to be maintained and sustained over particular periods of time as bargaining chips in order that our multifarious selves, fueled by personal ambitions, succeed in getting towards the finishing lines of our individualistic goals.
The point of contact between our selves and those that surrounds us; between our selves and those who holds the keys to our successes, towards the successes that we are hungry for; lies in communication which has as its substratum dialogue as we ventures outside itself to engage with other beings in the social-sphere. It is dialogue that is a lack between the Center of Power and the Far Left in a country that is divided politically. Everybody has an idea of the course of direction that is suppose to be taken in defining progress however selfishly they withhold their ideas from other key players in the journey. This can be the Center not being compliant or the Far Right not yielding to the Center of Power malicious wishing for its failure or vis-à-vis the Center seeking to eradicate oppositional power as an attempt to foster blind rule which is unimaginable in the face of a lack of opposition. How else will it be able to have a four dimensional rule if no one opposes what it stands for or its procedures of governance? A hero needs a villain to be a hero.
By suggesting that there should be an engagement of dialogue the present meditation inserts us within the paradigm of discourse. Only through an extended ongoing discussion can the state of affairs of a country be adequately defined. This can have positive results in the development of that country in that an earlier objective defined as positive to the development of that country can be retained and pursued or a new objective identified and pursued diligently. In the context of the Republic of South Africa this is the ideal of the Rainbow Nation.
Behind the backdrop of social unrest Soothsayers have proclaimed doom for Freedom Day 2010. Like the ageless sun it did come but not with doom attached to it as a form of racial purification that all have feared for. It was a quite day except for toned-down celebration of the day itself across the Republic. It was a cloudy rainy day in Gauteng.
If by some terrible turn of events one’s skull had been knocked in by a fatal blow that dimmed the living daylights and if by some ounce of luck one was revived from that horrid experience fifteen years later one would’ve gotten a very bad gut feeling that something was wrong with the unfolding narrative before them despite prevalent calm. For the hype that we saw fifteen years ago was missing. It had trickled off. Contradictorily you will pick up via the telly-news or print-news the disgruntled Center of Power’s attempts to resuscitate and reassert the importance of 27 April 1994 at the Uni-B and while on the other side of the Galaxy the Oppositional Trio-Forces (OTF) merged at Con-Hill to highlight the Center of Power’s undermining of the very freedom Freedom Day is about. Is this dialogue in situ? No.
It is sad that the OTF should unite in order to discredit the Center of Power by capitalizing on its failings. This undoubtedly throws into stark relief the fact that the far right, like the ultra right that sought revenge after E Terry B’s death, is not ready to work jointly in the status quo to improve our so called The Rainbow Nation. In fact one can go a step beyond and proclaim that the OTF wants the chair that the present Center of Power occupies for its own selfish motives. One then wonders whether a coalition which has as its basis malice and anger and a few cards on the table can survive the honeymoon should victory be attained. The Shikota realm should sound a warning bell towards that direction. The only ideology which marries oppositional forces in our country is that of pointing the wrong things.
One may ask why the OTF chose 27 April to clasp hands in solidarity against the present demagogue. Cristal clear it is that such an act is committed to discredit the very Center of Power itself, to discredit 1994 as our bar of the highest form of liberation thus pushing and thumbing further asunder liberation in the Republic into the far flung distance. Outright Liberation did take place sixteen years ago. Like the rest of the world we are now battling with economic liberation which is very intimately tied with job security, nuanced, it is very much linked with the education system.
As already said elsewhere, direct influence, correcting and alleviation of our variant social tangible infrastructures by the opposition will crack open wide the door of possible choices come the next poll. Otherwise the opposition continues to draw a blank card to the Mzanzians. We have surely looked at the card for so long that we know what was there before it faded into insignificance. We are squinting for an eye freshener. Amongst the OTF who has a third eye to see this?
But let us go back above. It is through dialogue that the political arena can erect a realm that can begin to chart a new course towards hope not anarchy. At the basis of dialogue is communication: A simple environment where A says (i) to B who in turn says (ii) to A and a discussion ensues as A in turn responds saying eye eye eye or eye vee to B. In such a state an equilibrium calibrated system of engagement where solutions officiate occupies space. When this is in place dialogue then emerges.
At the elevated level of dialogue, above it that is, as it ensues, we reach discourse/s: A deliberation on issues of importance and mundane in order to throw light on what must happen to forecast and generate progress. Now as parties (A, B, C, K, etc…etc…) involved in the communication process, disagree/agreeing and setting ways in place of moving forward and operate; depending on what is it that is at stake a condition sets in at this level of communication and we begin to see a fabrication of an entity that manipulates social spheres known as Ideology. A somewhat prismatic layer through which the world can be experience and known.
Now I shall conclude this abstract jot!
It is through communication that results in dialogue which in turn ushers us at the doorstep of discourse wherein we shall have an engagement with the resultant Ideologies that can be specific to the condition of the state in question. Ours already exists – it is the Rainbow Nation Ideology which was hard earned through the discourse of the New South Africa pre 1994 and set in place on 27 April 1994. Today more than ever this Ideology needs a revitalization.
19 May 2010
© Mmutle Arthur Kgokong 2010